Operating tool / Free validation sample
Capacity Decision Lab
Compare current workload with an automation scenario. Separate existing from proposed savings, include exceptions and maintenance, and record an owned next step.
For Owner, Service manager, Automation & AI, Tech lead
Free validation sample
Review one workflow, one role or team and one reporting period. Compare available hours with current workload, then test a proposed automation scenario using net active human effort. Record the missing evidence and who will check it.
The existing HTML sample and XLSX contain fictional comparisons plus a blank review. They are the resource offered here. A simulated “Measured inputs” label is not a measured customer result.
Check the difficult cases
- Existing automation gets zero incremental scenario credit.
- Exceptions and recurring maintenance remain human work.
- Setup is deducted once in the first proposed period.
- An unknown baseline leaves the savings conclusion unsupported.
- Negative benefits stay visible when automation adds work.
What the comparison leaves unresolved
Aggregate hours do not establish peak or skill coverage, cash savings or a hire avoided. Use the result to choose an evidence check or a bounded pilot. The HTML calculations are browser-tested with fictional cases; this site's check does not establish editing or printing compatibility in Excel or other spreadsheet applications.
Free resource. There is no paid-edition offer or checkout on this page.
Before using the tool
Read the related free field guide. Use non-sensitive aggregates, inspect definitions and keep customer secrets out. See the license and terms.